TrueGSU.com

Follow GSUFANS.com on
     
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 73

Thread: New defensive Scheme

  1. Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle22 View Post
    When you have a Voncellies Allen, you run a 3-4

    Wished we had used the 3-4 in 1998
    Are you sure? I went and double checked a few of klack's videos from 99 and 00 to make sure before I posted that. I saw 4-3 and occasionally the nickel. I can't see them now at work, but I must be losing my mind...

  2. #22

    Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by JHamilton View Post
    Are you sure? I went and double checked a few of klack's videos from 99 and 00 to make sure before I posted that. I saw 4-3 and occasionally the nickel. I can't see them now at work, but I must be losing my mind...
    We based out of a three-man line, but we were multiple. In ‘99, for instance, we had Voncellies Allen at NT with Freddie P and Eugene Phillips flanking him as “DTs.” We often brought at least one OLB up to the LoS as a pass rusher, sometimes in a three point stance. Jamar Jones most often, but sometimes Mike Youngblood, too.

    In ‘99 NC game, we started off in a 5-2 look, with Jones and Youngblood both in a three-point stance.
    Last edited by pete4256; 21st December 2017 at 04:46 PM.
    Green Bastard
    Parts Unknown

  3. #23

    Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by eaglefan200 View Post
    Why? We convincingly won 14 games without it in 98.
    No, we convincingly outscored opponents in 14 games. Fell short of doing that once.

    Had we put our 2001 defense out there with the 1998 offense that would have been the most dominant I-AA team of all time.
    “Gentlemen, we will chase perfection, and we will chase it relentlessly, knowing all the while we can never attain it. But along the way, we shall catch excellence.” ― Vince Lombardi Jr.





  4. Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle22 View Post
    No, we convincingly outscored opponents in 14 games. Fell short of doing that once.

    Had we put our 2001 defense out there with the 1998 offense that would have been the most dominant I-AA team of all time.
    Our defense was sufficient for 14 games. What if 2001 vs 98 doesn't matter. You wanted a change to
    3-4 in our playoff game after 14 wins and we would automatically win?
    We don't change defensive schemes after 14-0 run. Are you serious?

  5. #25

    Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by eaglefan200 View Post
    Our defense was sufficient for 14 games. What if 2001 vs 98 doesn't matter. You wanted a change to
    3-4 in our playoff game after 14 wins and we would automatically win?
    We don't change defensive schemes after 14-0 run. Are you serious?
    We changed defensive schemes after going 14-1.......

  6. Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by Gsuwinsudont View Post
    We changed defensive schemes after going 14-1.......
    After!

  7. #27

    Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by Gsuwinsudont View Post
    We changed defensive schemes after going 14-1.......
    The defense didn't win those 14 games.
    Don't choose to be annoyed. Choose to be amused.

    If you think TK is the reason we don't have better non-conference football schedules, see this post.

  8. #28

    Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by eaglefan200 View Post
    After!
    The disconnect is you believing 22 is saying that he was dissatisfied with the defense in the one game we lost. I’ll let him speak to confirm it but he along with most of us weren’t pleased with that side of the ball throughout most of 98. The offense was just so explosive it managed to hide the poor defense and injuries, until it couldn’t.

  9. #29

    Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by BillyBob View Post
    The defense didn't win those 14 games.
    I wasn’t aware that i had said that it did ......

  10. Default Re: New defensive Scheme

    Quote Originally Posted by Gsuwinsudont View Post
    The disconnect is you believing 22 is saying that he was dissatisfied with the defense in the one game we lost. I’ll let him speak to confirm it but he along with most of us weren’t pleased with that side of the ball throughout most of 98. The offense was just so explosive it managed to hide the poor defense and injuries, until it couldn’t.
    At 14-1. I'll take that dissatisfied loss and slightly blame the defense if it makes you feel better even though its not totally true. Offensive production.

Similar Threads

  1. OLINE BLOCKING SCHEME
    By Hawgs in forum The Flight Line
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11th November 2016, 10:35 AM
  2. Defensive Scheme for this year?
    By BillyBob in forum The Flight Line
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 23rd January 2016, 11:11 AM
  3. Scheme vs WV?
    By scotchtkh in forum The Flight Line
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 19th August 2015, 09:02 PM
  4. Offensive scheme for '15?
    By scotchtkh in forum The Flight Line
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 4th August 2015, 08:16 PM
  5. Scheme and Playcalling?
    By gritzblitz56 in forum The Flight Line
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 4th November 2009, 09:56 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •